Prince Harry ‘wrong to blame the media’ bodyguard

Princess Diana’s former bodyguard has claimed Prince Harry “was wrong to blame the media” for his UK exit.

On January 8, 2020, Prince Harry and his spouse, Meghan Markle, announced that they’d be leaving the United Kingdom, in what the tabloids dubbed “Megxit.”

Queen Elizabeth II reportedly called an emergency summit days later to talk about the phrases of their departure, with Buckingham Palace asserting that the couple would not be working royals or use their “Royal Highness” (HRH) titles. The transition interval formally took impact a few months afterward March 31, 2020, marking the official conclusion of their working royal roles.

After the couple left the Royal Family, a 12-month review interval commenced, with the Palace stating on February 21, 2021, that their transfer was everlasting and that they’d formally relinquished their remaining honorary army appointments and royal patronages.

The couple’s main motive for his or her exit was hostility from the press, as Prince Harry often described the British tabloid media as “toxic” and damaging to his household’s well-being.

Moreover, he shared fears of historical past repeating itself, saying he feared for his spouse’s security, noting that the aggressive media pursuit echoed the treatment of his late mom, Princess Diana.

However, Diana’s former royal bodyguard Ken Wharfe has claimed that Harry was “wrong to blame the media” for leaving The Firm.

Ken, who grew to become certainly one of the Princess of Wales’s closest confidants during the most turbulent years of her marriage to the then-Prince Charles, spoke solely to the Daily Express US about Megxit.

According to Ken, he doesn’t consider that Harry’s relocation was a “direct consequence of his mother’s death,” however instead a “complex” state of affairs.

“Harry clearly has a deep dislike of the media and the paparazzi,” he said. “Much of his public life in recent years has centered around legal action against media organizations, together with his disputes with the Government and the Metropolitan Police over security.

“In my view, though, that has little or no to do with Diana.”

He explained that Diana “accepted media intrusion” as she understood it was part of being a royal, just as Queen Camilla and King Charles reportedly do.

Ken also noted the distinction between the press and the paparazzi, telling us on behalf of Casino Canada, “Members of the Royal Family still encounter paparazzi from time to time, however the level of intrusion today is nothing prefer it was during the Eighties and Nineteen Nineties. That’s mirrored in the sheer quantity of coverage. Back then, it was relentless.”

Yet Ken believes Harry was “improper” to blame the press, saying he thinks the Duke of Sussex “failed” to understand their role.

“Harry, for my part, was improper to blame the media in the approach that he has. I feel he has made a somewhat MGM manufacturing out of the media insofar as his spouse and household have been involved, and he is failed to discover a approach to acknowledge and take care of this,” he said.

“I feel he failed, for my part, to perceive the position of the media. Yes, the media could possibly be intrusive, as his mom skilled throughout her life, however the media didn’t kill Diana.”